Stats

  • 1 total features.
  • Layer is marked as complete.

Legend

  •   Features in database
  •   Conflicting features in OSM
  •   Layer extent
  •   Checked out
  •   Blocked
  •   Complete

Notes

UPLOADER NOTES

adjust and expand trail_visibility tags with on the ground confirmation

TAGGING REVIEW

GB: 17/8/2012 Kermadec tested and uploaded.
HB 21 Aug 2012: removed LINZ:track_use as always foot|vehicle which are set elsewhere. Approved for the Antarctic, note use of tracktype=poled_route. (168 of those on the mainland too). Please review before approving the mainland.

HISTORICAL DISCUSSION

highway=track or highway=path or highway=footway?

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Track
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tracktype
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpath
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hiking
---
HB: can we do anything better with track_type="poled route"? blazed=yes?
can we do anything better for (vehicle)track="unmaintained"?
--
RP: are other vehicles allowed on these tracks? does anyone know what the highway code says here - i have a feeling these are highway=footway, i.e. only for pedestrians?
--
HB: see "Object attributes": "unmaintained" applies only to vehicle tracks. vehicle=yes does not imply horse=no or anything else, just that vehicles are allowed. My understanding is that highway=footway is more for paved sidewalks, and 'path' is more for raw tramping/hiking trails (which these are).
--
Chathams uploaded 27 April 2010 (HB)
Auckland Island uploaded 13 Aug 2012 (HB) in changeset ?.
-- track use was lost due to extra whitespace in strings problem, but then later fixed by hand.
--

Current checkouts

User Features Status Checked Out
HamishB 1 Abandoned Aug. 13, 2012, 7:38 p.m.